What is it about?

Aki Kaurismäki’s feature-length fictional films are often discussed as a stylistically homogenous group. Because critics have looked for similarities, they have neglected differences among the films. This article tests prevailing arguments about the cinematographic style of Kaurismäki’s films in a quantitative analysis of shot lengths, camera movements, reverse angles, point of view shots, and shot scales. The analysis indicates significant similarities and changes among the films and notable stylistic changes. The results of the study complicate existing claims about Kaurismäki’s style. Mismatches between impression and fact are best explained by analyzing the parts of Kaurismäki’s style that "stand out" and the reasons why they do so.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

My analysis shows that the cinematography of Aki Kaurismäki’s films is significantly more complex, multifaceted and heterogeneous than critics have realized.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: On the Heterogeneity of Cinematography in the Films of Aki Kaurismäki, Projections, January 2015, Berghahn Journals,
DOI: 10.3167/proj.2015.090203.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page