What is it about?
This editorial highlights to methods paper we wrote on practical and philosophical aspects of mixed-methods research to help those planning and conducting mixed-methods studies. This paper is also freelyavailable through Open Access online: MacKenzie Bryers, H., van Teijlingen, E. Pitchforth, E. (2014) Advocating mixed-methods approaches in health research, Nepal Journal of Epidemiology 4(5): 417-422. http://www.nepjol.info/index.php/NJE/article/view/12018/9768 .
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Too many beginning scholars select a mixed-methods approach without considering the strength and weaknesses of such mixed-methods apoproach. Remember all methods have their own inherent strengths and weaknesses. Also becuase we can combine different quantitative and qualitative methods at one time not all mixed-methods research is the same!
Perspectives
We felt there was a need for a mixed-methods paper highlighting some of the key issue we had come across in various previous studies and reviewing papers for academic journals.
Professor Edwin R van Teijlingen
Bournemouth University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Mixed-methods approaches in health research in Nepal, Nepal Journal of Epidemiology, December 2014, Nepal Journals Online (NepJOL),
DOI: 10.3126/nje.v4i5.11993.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
