Publication not explained
This publication has not yet been explained in plain language by the author(s). However, you can still read the publication.
If you are one of the authors, claim this publication so you can create a plain language summary to help more people find, understand and use it.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: A randomized controlled trial of 24‐hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score ≤ 4, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, May 2010, Wiley,
DOI: 10.3109/00016340903575998.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
