What is it about?
Construction projects often face delays that lead to higher costs, disputes, and sometimes legal claims. This study introduces and tests a computerized model that applies the daily windows technique for delay analysis. Unlike traditional methods that look at longer time periods, this approach examines progress and setbacks on a day-by-day basis. By doing so, it provides a more accurate picture of which party (contractor, owner, or external factors) is responsible for delays and whether acceleration efforts can compensate for lost time. The model is tested with a case study to show how it works in practice and how it can fairly allocate responsibility for delays.
Featured Image
Photo by Joe Holland on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Delays are one of the most costly and contentious issues in construction, and choosing the wrong analysis method can lead to unfair claims or disputes. This study is important because it shows that the daily windows technique is more reliable than many traditional methods and is more likely to be accepted by courts. It also demonstrates how modern computerized tools can help construction managers, contractors, and owners make fairer decisions, reduce conflicts, and save both time and money. The findings can improve contract management, strengthen legal claims, and provide guidance for adopting more accurate delay analysis methods in future projects.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: CONSTRUCTION DELAY ANALYSIS USING DAILY WINDOWS TECHNIQUE, Journal of Engineering, January 2011, Journal of Engineering,
DOI: 10.31026/j.eng.2011.01.15.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







