What is it about?
This article examines Hilary Mantel’s Tudor trilogy about Thomas Cromwell, analysing how her portrayal challenges traditional ideas of English and British identity, especially in the context of Brexit. While Mantel dismisses direct links between the Reformation and Brexit, the study suggests that her books subtly question the myths that have shaped national identity. By showing Cromwell as a complex, flawed figure and using unreliable narration, Mantel invites readers to rethink the stories we tell ourselves about nationhood and history.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This article is important because it demonstrates how Mantel’s historical fiction questions long-standing national myths and narratives. Her nuanced portrayal of Cromwell acts as a critique of simplified ideas of Englishness, encouraging a more critical understanding of history and identity. It highlights the relevance of historical fiction in questioning social and national myths, especially in turbulent political times like Brexit.
Perspectives
This article not only offers a fresh perspective on Hilary Mantel's historical fiction: it is also the first to scrutinise all of the three novels in her highly-acclaimed Wolf Hall trilogy.
Dr José Igor Prieto-Arranz
University of the Balearic Islands
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Hilary Mantel’s Re-appropriation of Whig Historiography: A Reading of The Wolf Hall Trilogy in the Context of Brexit, Miscelánea A Journal of English and American Studies, June 2022, Universidad de Zaragoza,
DOI: 10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20226851.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







