What is it about?

Dear Authors, You may think writing a scientific manuscript is difficult. Providing you had a well-designed experiment based on a well-thought through question, it is quite simple, since it is a standard procedure. How to get it through the review process is a vital question for you, the author. The answer is very simple: please the editor and the reviewers. There is nothing more boring for editors and reviewers to make the same corrections again and again.Therefore, here is a list of the most common errors we see in our editorial work: The most prominent reasons for rejection or a straight route to revision are manuscripts that have a poor language or do not comply with the instructions for authors. We ask ourselves whether it is so difficult to read instructions and follow them. Not doing so at least prolongs the review process considerably. Most of us publish not in our mother tongue but in English. Ergo have an expert in dental research and English mother tongue look over your manuscript. If you do not know any, then look for some professional scientific editing service. The internet may help.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Ways to increase the probability of acceptance of a manuscript., STOMATOLOGY EDU JOURNAL, January 2019, ROPOSTURO Romanian Association of Oral Rehabilitation and Posturotherapy,
DOI: 10.25241/stomaeduj.2019.6(3).edit.2.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page