Planning the First Fuel Stations, Landing Pads, and Habitats for the Moon and Mars

“

Writing this paper forced me to confront the gap between visionary thinking and engineering honesty. It is tempting to describe Mars bases as if they are a decade away, but the TRL data tells a humbler story. We have demonstrated oxygen production on Mars at roughly 10 grams per hour with MOXIE, while a crewed ascent vehicle needs roughly 30 kilograms per hour. That is a factor of a thousand. I included those numbers deliberately because I believe the space community serves the public better when it is transparent about scale. What gives me optimism is the phased structure: we do not need to solve everything at once. Robotic site surveys in the 2030s, precursor outposts in the 2040s, and crewed operations in the 2050s is an achievable sequence if we commit to iterative validation. The site-selection analysis was particularly rewarding. Malapert Mountain emerged as the highest-scoring lunar candidate due to its near-continuous solar access and direct Earth line-of-sight, but the trade-offs are genuine. Shackleton Crater offers superior ice proximity, while Nobile Crater has LCROSS-confirmed volatiles. On Mars, Elysium Planitia scored highest for its equatorial solar irradiance and InSight-validated terrain, but Arcadia Planitia's strong subsurface ice evidence makes it the better ISRU candidate. These are the decisions that will determine where humanity's first permanent structures are built. I also feel strongly that governance cannot be an afterthought. If we wait until multiple nations and companies are operating on the lunar south pole to figure out traffic rules and resource rights, we will have created conflicts that could have been prevented. The ISDA concept is my attempt to get ahead of that problem, modeled on ICAO's proven approach to aviation standardization. The window to establish these norms is narrow; the decisions made in this decade will shape the architecture of interplanetary civilization for centuries.

”