What is it about?

We simulated Mach 15 air over a blunt wedge with direct molecular simulation (DMS) on first-principles potential energy surfaces (electronic ground states only: N2, O2, NO, N, O). The wall is isothermal with full accommodation, at 1,000 K and 2,000 K. Compared with CFD that uses legacy chemistry, DMS predicts substantially higher heat flux, because CFD’s adiabatic wall temperature is too low (different dissociation and NO formation). In DMS, wall temperature also changes the near-wall composition, especially atomic oxygen and NO; the CFD fields look almost the same at both wall temperatures.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

If continuum CFD cannot see wall-temperature effects on atomic species, it will mis-set the boundary condition for any gas–surface chemistry. DMS here is a numerical experiment at a level of detail a wind tunnel cannot provide, and it is a hard test for the thermochemical and transport models inside production CFD.

Perspectives

The earlier JFM blunt-wedge DMS paper did not include me; this SciTech paper is the wall-temperature follow-on. The composition sensitivity at the wall is the result I would want a TPS or catalycity modeler to take away.

Zach Davis
Space Dynamics Laboratory

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: An Investigation of a Mach 15 Flow Over a Blunt Wedge Using First-Principles Potential Energy Surfaces: Influence of Wall Temperature, January 2026, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA),
DOI: 10.2514/6.2026-1467.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page