What is it about?
This study explains how uncertainties in computer simulations of airflow around a missile are evaluated. These simulations, which use Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations, focus on the missile's behavior in transonic speeds (between Mach 0.8 and 1.2). The main goal is to understand how different ways of modeling turbulence can affect the missile's aerodynamic performance. To do this, the SU2 EQUiPS Module is used to assess how much uncertainty there is in calculating the axial force (which pushes or pulls the missile along its length) across various angles of attack. The results show that the predictions made by the SST turbulence model closely match experimental data. By evaluating the uncertainty in these simulations, we gain a clearer picture of how accurate they are, which helps improve the design and control of missiles through better-informed decisions.
Featured Image
Photo by SpaceX on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This study offers a unique approach to evaluating uncertainties in computer simulations of airflow around a missile, specifically in transonic speeds. What sets this work apart is its focus on how different methods of modeling turbulence—one of the most complex aspects of fluid dynamics—can significantly affect the aerodynamic performance predictions. By honing in on this area, the research sheds light on a critical factor often overlooked in missile design. The study uses advanced computational tools, like the SU2 EQUiPS Module, to systematically assess the uncertainty in calculating the axial force (the force acting along the length of the missile) over a range of angles of attack. This analysis isn’t just about getting numbers—it’s about understanding how confident we can be in those numbers. The results, which show a strong agreement between predictions from the SST turbulence model and experimental data, demonstrate the potential to bridge the gap between simulations and real-world performance. By quantifying the uncertainties in these simulations, the study provides designers and engineers with a clearer understanding of how accurate their performance predictions are, ultimately leading to better decisions in missile design, optimization, and control. This work can be a game-changer for the industry, where even small improvements in predictive accuracy can lead to major advancements in missile performance, safety, and efficiency. It's not just about fine-tuning simulations; it's about elevating the entire design process with deeper insights and more reliable data.
Perspectives
This study describes the approach for assessing uncertainties in CFD simulations solving the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations for a generic missile geometry in transonic flows. The steady-state RANS simulations are performed for two Mach numbers of 0.8 and 1.2 for the generic missile geometry. Specifically, the uncertainties in aerodynamic performance caused by turbulence modeling are investigated. The SU2 EQUiPS Module is used to evaluate uncertainties in the axial force coefficient for a range of angle of attack values. The results with the perturbed solutions show that the uncertainty bounds for the numerical results with the SST turbulence model agree well with experimental data. Reflecting on this work, I find the focus on uncertainty quantification particularly fascinating, as it delves into an area that’s often underappreciated but crucial in high-stakes fields like missile design. It’s easy to overlook just how much small variations in turbulence models can impact performance predictions, but this research highlights that these uncertainties are not just noise—they have real-world implications. By systematically addressing them, we are taking a significant step forward in enhancing the reliability of computational predictions. In my view, this study goes beyond simply verifying a simulation; it serves as a bridge between theoretical models and physical reality, which is invaluable for improving both design accuracy and overall missile performance. The insights gained through uncertainty quantification in RANS simulations help in better understanding performance analyses for missile aerodynamics and contribute to more informed decision-making in the design and control of missiles. For me, this adds a layer of depth to the work, making it not just a technical endeavor but also an intellectual exercise in refining our understanding of how simulations relate to real-world outcomes.
Salih Kağan Durmuş
Orta Dogu Teknik Universitesi
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Numerical Investigation of Aerodynamic Uncertainties Caused by Turbulence Modeling for a Missile in Transonic Flow, July 2024, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA),
DOI: 10.2514/6.2024-4468.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
