What is it about?
The study explores whether government financial support for university Research and Development (R&D) encourages or replaces private business investment. In the world of economics, this is known as the debate between complements (where one drives the other) and substitutes (where one replaces the other). It analyzes data from 23 EU countries over a 20-year period (1999–2019) to see how changes in public funding and funding from abroad (like EU grants) affect the amount of money businesses choose to invest in higher education. The "Complementary" Effect: The core finding is that government funding acts as a complement to business funding. This means that when a government increases its financial support for universities, it actually attracts more private investment from businesses rather than pushing it away. Quantifying the Impact: - Short-Run: A 1% increase in government R&D spending leads to a 0.23% to 0.4% increase in business spending within a short timeframe. - Long-Run: Over time, this effect grows significantly, with the same 1% increase in public funds potentially leading to a 0.7% increase in business funding. The Importance of Infrastructure: The paper explains that this happens because government funding builds the research infrastructure and develops the human capital (trained researchers) that businesses need to conduct their own applied research. Signalling Quality: High levels of government funding serve as a quality signal to the private sector. Businesses are more likely to partner with universities that have already been "vetted" and supported by significant public investment. The Role of International Funding: The study also found that funding from abroad (such as the EU's Horizon Europe program) has a similar positive effect on business investment, particularly in the long run.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The most important results and the reasoning behind them are summarized below: 1. Government Funding Acts as a "Complement" to Business Investment The core finding of the study is that government and business funding are complements, not substitutes. Government funding provides the necessary research infrastructure and human capital (trained researchers) that businesses need to conduct their own applied research. Additionally, high levels of public funding act as a quality signal, making a university more attractive to private partners. 2. Significant Growth in the Long Run The study identifies that the positive impact of public spending grows substantially over time. 3. The Positive Role of International Funding Funding from abroad (such as EU programs like Horizon Europe) also plays a vital role in motivating private investment. 4. No Evidence of "Crowding Out" The research explicitly refutes the idea that public funding "crowds out" or replaces private investment in the European context.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Government and Business Funding of Sources of Funds for R&D at Universities: Complements or Substitutes?, South East European Journal of Economics and Business, December 2023, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.2478/jeb-2023-0021.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







