What is it about?

We examine when and how auditors are most likely to whistle-blow on other auditors. We find that auditors are most likely to whistle-blow on other auditors who have a history or poor performance and are less likable. Additionally, we find auditors are more likely to whistle-blow internally than externally, and through non-anonymous outlets than anonymous outlets.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Our contributions include exploring the impact of reputation on the actions of third parties, and advancing prior literature by considering the influence of wrongdoer attributes on reporting decisions and auditors’ reporting channel preferences.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Does Wrongdoer Reputation Matter? Impact of Auditor-Wrongdoer Performance and Likeability Reputations on Fellow Auditors' Intention to Take Action and Choice of Reporting Outlet, Behavioral Research in Accounting, November 2011, American Accounting Association,
DOI: 10.2308/bria-50022.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page