What is it about?

Accounting estimates are highly subjective and multiple estimation alternatives often exist. When addressing audit-related adjustments with clients, auditors must decide whether to discuss all possible estimation alternatives or approach the client with only a single, auditor-preferred estimation alternative. In an experiment with experienced finance executives, we find clients with relatively higher status (those with a CPA license) take more aggressive financial reporting positions when the auditor approaches the client with multiple adjustment options.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Our study provides the first evidence that client status is a significant factor in auditor-client negotiations. We also demonstrate how auditors’ approach to client negotiations involving multiple allowable estimation alternatives can influence audit quality.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The Effects of Client Status and the Auditor's Presentation of Multiple Estimation Alternatives on Client Financial Reporting Aggressiveness, Behavioral Research in Accounting, March 2020, American Accounting Association,
DOI: 10.2308/bria-19-025.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page