What is it about?
Experiment was conducted to see if organizations can use persuasive communications to change employees' attitudes toward whistle-blowing even when employees are facing the possibility of retaliation.
Why is it important?
This study finds that persuasive communications can improve the employee's attitude toward whistle-blowing. This study also finds that the change in attitude is larger when the employee is facing a higher threat of retaliation from other employees or management. This is important because some organizations have a culture that is not favorable to whistle-blowers, which reduces the likelihood an employee will blow the whistle. However, even in an organization with an existing culture that is not supporting of whistle-blowing, the use of positive persuasive messages can be useful for changing the employee's attitude toward whistle-blowing so that he/she is more likely to blow the whistle.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Blowing the Whistle: Individual Persuasion under Perceived Threat of Retaliation, Behavioral Research in Accounting, September 2017, American Accounting Association, DOI: 10.2308/bria-51729.
You can read the full text:
The following have contributed to this page