What is it about?

A critique of sociological assumption that social processes are law-based, quantifiable and predictable.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Sociological research has largely relied on the assumption, sometimes referred to as the Newtonian Paradigm, that social causation is linear, predictable and repeatable. This article argues that in real social life causation is exceedingly complex, frequently non-linear and unpredictable, and historical and unrepeatable. In a complex and changing world other things never remain equal. We can therefore not expect that the same cause will have the same consequence later in an event sequence.

Perspectives

This article is a plea for the recognition of the complexity of social causation. It led me to take a closer look at evolutionary theory as a theoretical framework for understanding the role of chance and unintended consequences in social processes and the growth of social structures.

Professor Bernd Baldus
University of Toronto

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Positivism's Twilight?, The Canadian Journal of Sociology, January 1990, JSTOR,
DOI: 10.2307/3340748.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page