What is it about?

A Review of the Science about Waterside Hypotheses of Human Evolution 50 years after Alister Hardy first published his ideas.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The field of paleoanthropology has exhibited an astonishing betrayal of the principles of open-minded scientific enquiry in it 60-year response the so-called "aquatic ape hypothesis" of Alister Hardy and Elaine Morgan. This volume showcases some of the science that has been done by academics in other fields.

Perspectives

I contributed two chapters (one a long-overdue critique of John Langdon's '97 JHE critique of the "AAH" and a chapter promoting the much maligned and incredibly ignored wading hypothesis of hominid bipedal origins.) I also wrote a joint chapter with Elaine Morgan outlining the various scenarios espoused by proponents of these ideas and, at last, formally define what waterside hypotheses of human evolution are. Hopefully, academics will now be able to evaluate these hypotheses (plural) on their actual merits not on a straw man portrayal of what they imagine it (singular) is.

Algis Kuliukas
University of Western Australia

Comparative anatomy & physiology leave no doubt that human ancestors spent a lot of time diving for shallow-aquatic prey such as shellfish (cf. the so-called "aquatic ape hypothesis" of Alister Hardy & Elaine Morgan). Detailed comparisons suggest: -Mio-Pliocene hominoids (fossil apes, incl. Plio-Pleistocene australopithecines) evolved: larger size, very broad sternum (Latisternalia), wide thorax & pelvis, centrally-placed spine (more orthogrady), longer arms, more plantigrady, tail loss (coccyx incorporated into pelvic bottom). All this can best be explained by an aquarboreal lifestyle (aqua=water, arbor=tree), wading bipedally & climbing arms overhead in the branches above in flooded forests, e.g. mangroves, forest swamps etc. Australopiths were no closer relatives of Homo than of Pan or Gorilla, google "aquarboreal ancestors". Extant apes apparently survived the Pleistocene coolings by spending less time in the water, but google e.g. "bonobo wading" or "gorilla bai". -Early-Pleistocene Homo evolved a littoral lifestyle, frequently diving for shallow-aquatic foods such as shellfish: this best explains Homo's brain enlargement, pachy-osteo-sclerosis, platycephaly, external nose (google "Oi big nose"), full plantigrady, platypelloidy, platymeria (dorso-ventrally flattened femora), stone tool use & island colonizations (e.g. Flores), google "coastal dispersal Pleistocene Homo PPT Verhaegen". From the coasts, different "archaic" Homo populations, such as neandertals, entered the land probably initially seasonally along the rivers. Late-Pleistocene H.sapiens reduced diving, and elaborated wading-walking, cf. diet of e.g. rice etc.

Marc Verhaegen

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Was Man More Aquatic in the Past? Fifty Years After Alister Hardy - Waterside Hypotheses of Human Evolution, November 2011, Bentham Science Publishers,
DOI: 10.2174/97816080524481110101.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page