What is it about?
The paper presents a study of policies of modern states regarding the institution of international election observation. The study is based on the application of constructivism and realism as the main theories of international relations to explain the actions of national governments in this area. The features of the institution of international election observation in the context of its compliance with the principle of state sovereignty are revealed.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The institution of international election observation not only eliminates the Westphalian understanding of state sovereignty, but also creates new forms of international accountability of national governments. Within the framework of constructivism, international observation is seen as an institution that promotes democratization and supports progressive trends within the country through the assistance of the international community. The theory of realism acts as the ideological basic for national governments seeking to limit the activities of observers. Within the framework of realism, international observers are viewed as representatives of foreign states that pose a threat to national interests. The article identifies and describes the main models and methods of policies of governments seeking to limit and control international observation.
Perspectives
Short historical experience is also a factor that makes it difficult for national governments to choose effective means towards international observation.
Nikolai Grishin
Saint Petersburg State University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: POLICIES OF STATES TOWARDS INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVATION, Political Expertise POLITEX, January 2021, Saint Petersburg State University,
DOI: 10.21638/spbu23.2021.203.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







