What is it about?
Our publication about the outcomes of the minimally invasive endoscopic resection for the treatment of the sinonasal malignancy, and also explored the surgical method which might decreased the recurrence.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The existing studies of same issue provided low-level evidence, and this study is a large-sample size cohort of china, the outcomes of it gave weight to the notion that minimally invasive endoscopic resection is a alternative operation for well selected patients. On the other hand, we explored the surgical method which obtained satisfied outcomes, and that was little discussed in the existing studies.
Perspectives
Regrettably，this paper also has many limitations, including insufficient sample cases, without control group, not long-enough follow-up, and so on. So the multi -center prospective study with control group and long-term follow-up is expected in the future.
宁 何
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Minimally invasive endoscopic resection for the treatment of sinonasal malignancy: the outcomes and risk factors for recurrence, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, May 2017, Dove Medical Press,
DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s131185.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
