What is it about?

In light of the conflicts and instabilities reported in strategic alliances, the purpose of this paper is to examine the interorganizational domain that affects the endurance and continuity of collaboration and explain how the alliance interface contexts determines the structuring of alliance governance.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

In light of the conflicts and instabilities reported in strategic alliances, the purpose of this paper is to examine the interorganizational domain that affects the endurance and continuity of collaboration and explain how the alliance interface contexts determines the structuring of alliance governance.

Perspectives

The alliance governance – whether equity or nonequity based – through which an alliance is governed serves as a mechanism to protect a firm from partner’s opportunistic behavior, manage resource dependence and facilitate knowledge sharing. Alliance governance structure also reflects the risk, reward and control that partners perceive in a relationship. In light of the conflicts and instabilities reported in strategic alliances, it is critical to examine the interorganizational domain that affects the endurance and continuity of collaboration and explain how the alliance interface contexts determines the structuring of alliance governance. An empirical examination, using survey and archival data, revealed that the complexity of alliance task, balance of power, and competitive scope between partners are significantly related to the mode of alliance governance – whether nonequity, minority-equity, or joint venture.

Dr Senthil Kumar Muthusamy
Slippery Rock University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Role of Context and Contest in the Choice of Alliance Governance Structure, SSRN Electronic Journal, January 2011, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.955088.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page