What is it about?

Recent efforts and initiatives by the Basel Committee and the Financial Stability Board also focus around the need to address risks attributed to Securities Financing Transactions - as well as shadow banking activities.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Risks attributed to Securities Financing Transactions are considered to be of a systemic nature as highlighted in the following statement: The Financial Stability Board (FSB:2019) recognizes the vital role assumed by SFTs such as securities lending and repurchase agreements (repos), in supporting i) price discovery – as well as ii) secondary market liquidity for a wide variety of securities. However, it is also recognized that such transactions can also be used to iii) take on leverage as well as iv) maturity and liquidity mismatched exposures, and therefore can pose risks to financial stability.

Perspectives

Securities Financing Transactions and shadow banking industries are markets which have not only immense and strategic roles in view of their functions – as well as in terms of their systemic relevance and effects, but which many enterprises have used to conceal real assets values and disguise or transfer assets in the forms of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs). Further more, the paper also contributes to the current literature by highlighting why other possible instruments which also serve as SPVs, by virtue of their nature and potential consequences (and benefits) need to be regulated on a central basis.

Prof Marianne Ojo
Northwestern University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Financial Stability, New Macro Prudential Arrangements and Shadow Banking: Regulatory Arbitrage and Stringent Basel III Regulations, SSRN Electronic Journal, Social Science Electronic Publishing,
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1859543.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page