What is it about?
This chapter highlights why the introduction of two liquidity standards, namely the LCR (Liquidity Coverage Ratio) and the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) - as well as the leverage ratios , supplementary leverage ratios and enhanced supplementary leverage ratios had to be introduced as complements to the Basel risk based capital adequacy framework - given the need to address the quality and quantity of capital - through the additional core capital requirements - as well as the introduction of conservative and counter cyclical capital buffers - features which were not present under Basel II. Moreover, additional capital buffer requirements were imposed on systemic global institutions (GSIBs).
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The need to address pro cyclical effects (regarded as one of the major flaws of Basel II) prompted 2010 Basel III Regulations (liquidity standards/ LCR and NSFR - as well as leverage ratios) following the 2008/2009 Financial Crisis. It accentuated the fact that even though banks may still be operating within legally stipulated capital requirements, they may still encounter liquidity problems - as well as consequences of excessive deleveraging processes.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Great Expectations, Predictable Outcomes and the G20's Response to the Recent Global Financial Crisis: When Matters Relating to Liquidity Risks Become Equally as Important as Measures Addressing Pro Cyclicality, SSRN Electronic Journal, Social Science Electronic Publishing,
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1753653.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page