What is it about?

抛弃“同行评议”,获得“专家共识” https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-279293-1377383.html http://finance.sina.com.cn/hy/20131119/105717365753.shtml http://finance.sina.com.cn/hy/20131119/105717365756.shtml 张维迎:创新就是大部分人都不认同的想法 https://www.wenmi.com/article/puj98i03nn9k.html 多数人认同的不叫创新 https://www.yicai.com/news/5345088.html 许小年:创新没有风口,凡是追逐风口的行为都不是创新 https://www.sass.org.cn/_s3/_t31/2008/1229/c1201a26145/page.psp 但“创新”意味着与众不同,公认的东西往往是常识 https://news.ifeng.com/c/7fcJvZmKtue 学术评价与学术程序的质量都取决于学术共同体的质量 颠覆传统理论的创新会在高引论文中产生吗?有那么高共识的论文能是颠覆性创新吗? https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/AyrjTS71DImtO3HQy-irfw 受不了了!在论文修改了5次之后,作者终于“怒怼”了审稿人!没想到这篇回复竟发了SCI https://zhidao.baidu.com/question/1438671826557224739.html https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1669193669905192103&wfr=spider&for=pc https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1730445894371096545&wfr=spider&for=pc https://www.163.com/dy/article/EESVUABL053780N4.html https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1653433345458611991&wfr=spider&for=pc http://www.360doc.com/content/19/0320/16/60903167_822931855.shtml https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1702780539389791265&wfr=spider&for=pc 为何近几十年来,物理学已经没有重大突破或者发现了 原因是现代科学只重视依靠仪器的实验研究,不像牛顿时代重视用数学揭示实验现象背后的本质的理论研究。另外,同行评审制度打压,使突破传统理论的创新发表不出了。 “Beyond these considerations, the importance of many of the more recent developments cannot be evaluated objectively at this time. The history of mathematics teaches us that many subjects which aroused tremendous enthusiasm and engaged the attention of the best mathematicians ultimately faded into oblivion ... Indeed one of the interesting questions that the history answers is what survives in mathematics. History makes its own and sounder evaluations.” --Morris Kline, Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, Oxford University Press, 1972, ISBN 0-19-506136-5 引申:历史是最公正的。历史反复证明,那些在当世喧嚣尘上的东西往往是主流学者刻意炒作的糟粕,而那些被当世打压的经常是真金白银。 梳理这段历史,会发现这些重大原始创新在刚面世时都遭到了业界的质疑和抵制,差点夭折。 这不是个例,浮栅晶体管、异质结、绝缘栅双极型晶体管(IGBT)、微机电系统(MEMS)、浸没式光刻等重大发明都遭到过抵制。 为什么这些发明一开始都不受待见呢?芯片的发展离不开持续的创新和超越,然而创新越大,对传统的叛逆和颠覆也越大,因而遭到传统势力的抵制就越大。 中国科学报,2023-09-16 第3版 读书 When delving into this historical period, it becomes apparent that these groundbreaking original innovations faced skepticism and opposition within the industry upon their initial emergence, nearly teetering on the brink of extinction. This phenomenon is not an isolated occurrence; major breakthroughs like floating-gate transistors, heterojunctions, insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs), microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), immersion lithography, and others have also confronted resistance. What prompted this initial lack of acceptance for these inventions? The advancement of semiconductor technology hinges on ongoing innovation and breakthroughs. However, the greater the innovation, the more it challenges and disrupts established norms, resulting in heightened resistance from traditional forces. Published in China Science Daily, September 16, 2023, 3rd Edition, Book Review. https://news.sciencenet.cn/dz/dzzz_1.aspx?dzsbqkid=39253 https://news.sciencenet.cn/dz/upload/2023/9/20239156508226.pdf https://www.peeref.com/roulette-hubs/1044 https://www.peeref.com/roulette-hubs/1037 https://www.peeref.com/roulette-hubs/1040 https://www.peeref.com/roulette-hubs/1036 https://www.peeref.com/roulette-hubs/1026 https://www.peeref.com/roulette-hubs/1046

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Natural Mathematical Derivation of the Gibbs-Duhem Equation, March 2022, Research Square,
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1061987/v1.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page