What is it about?

This study examines the relationship between government ownership and performance of listed firms on the Nairobi Securities Exchange. The quadratic term of government ownership is included in the model to test for the effect of increasing government ownership levels on performance. We use panel data techniques on 102 firm-year observations between 2003 and 2013 for all the listed firms in which the government directly owns some shares. We find no relationship between government ownership and performance at lower levels of government ownership. We find a negative relationship between government ownership and performance at higher levels of government ownership. We estimate, through differentiation of the Tobin’s Q model, that government ownership has a negative effect on performance when government ownership exceeds 41%. The study concludes that lower government ownership levels do not affect firm performance but as the ownership rises, government ownership has a detrimental effect on firm performance. We provide implications of these results for policy and practice.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

As developing countries, the government has a stake in the economy as an owner of firms, some listed on the securities markets. This study shows whether there is value in state ownership of firms.

Perspectives

Kenya as a developmental state should check whether state-driven development offers value over private sector-led development. Scrutinizing whether state ownership in firms offers any tangible value is important for policy purposes.

FREDRICK ODHIAMBO
ResearchPro Solutions

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Government Ownership and Value of Listed Firms in Kenya: A Panel Data Evidence, American Journal of Trade and Policy, August 2015, ABC Journals,
DOI: 10.18034/ajtp.v2i2.382.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page