What is it about?
This study analyses the development of Indonesia within the Global Value Chain (GVC) as a result of the intensive fragmentation of Production Networks in Asia. By employing a Global Input-Output Table covering 64 countries and 34 different sectors, this study measures the integration of Indonesia within the Global Value Chain by breaking down its gross exports into components of value-added. We look at the period of 1995 to 2015. The system allows for differentiating value-added exports that goes in the form of intermediate goods or final products, as well as direct exports, and indirect ones (multiple-cross-border trade). By doing so we can track how value-added travels across regional and global chains and how links are created with regional and global partners.
Featured Image
Photo by frank mckenna on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Asia has experienced a deep fragmentation in production and trade, resulting in changes in the patterns of trade and integration. More than 75% of total trade is in intermediate goods suggesting that countries participate more actively in producing specific shares of value-added of goods rather than entire products. Value-added exported under fragmented production networks account for the largest share of export growth, allowing countries to expand at a faster than usual speed. Only within 1995 to 2011 Indonesian value-added exports expanded by more than 300% from 1995 to 2011. The rapid change also suggests a change in the trade focus of Indonesia as it re-directed towards Asian partners, mainly to specific sectors within mining (33% of the increase) and within manufacturing (41% of growth).
Perspectives
Indonesia shifted towards exports of intermediate inputs within the initial section of the GVC. A substantial share of value-added goods traveled via regional partners towards international markets, although most of the domestic value-added remained in Asia. Indonesia differs from its ASEAN partners as it incorporates larger shares of domestic value-added in its exports than they do; it has a stronger role than they in exports of intermediate goods; it is more oriented towards regional partners; and has a lower presence than others within high technological exports.
Dr Miguel Angel Esquivias Padilla
Universitas Airlangga
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Value Chains, Production Networks and Regional Integration: The Case of Indonesia, January 2020, Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM Press),
DOI: 10.17576/jem-2020-5401-10.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







