What is it about?

Civil engineers used to boast that they controlled the natural environment. Society needs engineers to prepare a robust and resilient infrastructure for a rapidly changing world. The forensic approach is to use Briefing Papers to quiz world class scientists on the current and future conditions in a manner achieved in few journals and to then assess the risks. Technical papers then provide new perspectives on infrastructure such as the electricity supply, scour to bridges, healing washout of water channels and designing for hurricanes.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This second 2017 forensic review of climate change confirms the worst fears from the 2015 review. Society hopes that risks are low, but it should be clear to technical engineers that they need to assess the new risks associated with the carbon footprint of each project and the range of potential climate conditions. The evidence is clear that extinction and genocide can be expected unless drastic action is taken. This would leave most engineers and companies vulnerable to liabilities for failing to address the risks.

Perspectives

From the perspective of 2019, when climate change has finally been noticed, the papers and briefings in the 2017 and 2015 forensic reviews should have alerted the engineering community to the dangers so drastic action could have been taken.

Robert Thorniley-Walker
Institution of Civil Engineers

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Editorial, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Forensic Engineering, May 2017, ICE Publishing,
DOI: 10.1680/jfoen.2017.170.2.47.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page