What is it about?
In this research work, the author focuses on the analysis of the problem of specificity the regulatory protectionism in contemporary foreign trade policy. It has been emphasized that the talks between EU and USA will make reducing regulatory barriers. New agreements to remove trade barriers aim at reducing dead\-weight costs and at increasing net social gains from international trade.
Featured Image
Photo by Jonathan Kemper on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The article examined the impact of investor\-state dispute resolution mechanisms in reducing the power of national governments to regulate and elimination of market inequality. The article offers examples of successful regulatory cooperation efforts in the hope that it will shed light on possible approaches to addressing regulatory divergences
Perspectives
Ideally, the best way to address problems arising from regulatory divergence would be on a multilateral basis.
Professor PhD DSc Zdzisław W. Puślecki
Uniwersytet im Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: THE SPECIFICITY OF REGULATORY PROTECTIONISM IN CONTEMPORARY FOREIGN TRADE POLICY, Management Forum, January 2018, Wroclaw University of Economics,
DOI: 10.15611/pn.2018.509.30.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
