What is it about?

Having shown in other articles that the early Buddhist approach to knowledge was not rational/empirical/scientific in any modern sense (re: Kalamasutta, Payasisutta), this article is an initial exploration of what the approach actually may have been, in particular, what makes a "view" wrong or false, hoping to shed light on what makes a "view" right or true.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Epistemology of the Brahmajāla Sutta, Buddhist Studies Review, August 2009, Equinox Publishing,
DOI: 10.1558/bsrv.v26i1.67.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page