What is it about?
Flexibility of attentional/executive control was investigated in possible relation to individual differences in hypnotic susceptibility.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
High, medium and low hypnotizable subjects (N=40) underwent a task switching experiment in a non-hypnotic context. The experimental method combined the instructed (alternating runs) and non-instructed (voluntary) versions of task switching procedure. In a run of nine, spatially different trials, task specific cues assigned the task to perform on bivalent stimuli (instructed switch and repetition) but, at two highlighted sequential positions the subjects could determine freely where to switch with balanced frequency (voluntary switch and repetition). The switch cost was found robust in the instructed condition but decreasing when going from instructed to the voluntary condition, in each experimental group. The frequency of the switches was unbalanced across the two voluntary switching positions, and the switch cost proved smaller at the preferred one. In the voluntary switch cost a marginally reliable (p=0.065) difference was found between the preferred and non-preferred switching positions only in the group of highly hypnotizable subjects.
Perspectives
The results can be interpreted as a subtle indication of more effective attentional performance of susceptible subjects when implementation of strategic control is possible.
Zoltán Kondé
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Hipnotikus fogékonyság és exekutív hatékonyság, Pszichológia, December 2013, Akademiai Kiado,
DOI: 10.1556/pszicho.33.2013.4.2.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







