What is it about?
This article investigates the transition from a history of ideas approach to an intellectual history methodology, utilising a thirty-year study of Latvian philosophy's historiography as a specific case study example. https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s11212-024-09678-7?sharing_token=zMAmmqHwUGZ--NCpYdCh5_e4RwlQNchNByi7wbcMAY69KNCOrY0UTf9pv_fbLTKHuaDIbVf29J0yMCYrK0In7Ckdlx49Sgy0o4Vm4erALdVJEnTbdHCSO6Xe8sREJc8uDyyui0abe6_ZRAF4CQGp6LjKh8m5n8BhtoLisc5ddE4%3D
Featured Image
Photo by Andrew Neel on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Changes in methodology within the field of philosophy's historical study prompt an examination of the methods used by historians of philosophy, as well as the rising difficulties encountered due to the growing role of intellectual history.
Perspectives
The article argues for a rigorous analysis of the relationship between the history of philosophy and the broader field of intellectual history, highlighting the need to create innovative research methodologies.
PhD Andris Hiršs
Latvian Academy of Culture
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Tendencies in the Historiography of Latvian Philosophy, Problemos, October 2023, Vilnius University Press,
DOI: 10.15388/problemos.2023.104.2.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
