What is it about?

Bulk oxide determinations from two pairs of portland cements provide the basis for calculating the precision and accuracy for X-ray fluorescence analyses for both the fused glass bead and the pressed powder sample preparation methods for eleven analytes: CaO, SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, SO3, MgO, Na2O, K2O, TiO2, P2O5, and Cl. Precision measures for within- and between-laboratory performance are presented as 1-s and 95 % limits. Accuracy criteria are based upon a two-sided 95 % prediction interval for the mean of two test results, defining the range of values one might expect for each analyte relative to a certified value of a reference material.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The results of the study provide a picture of the within- and between-laboratory precision and bias for XRF analyses of cements, allowing any lab to test their protocol against the collective results of a large number of laboratories.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Performance Criteria for Chemical Analysis of Hydraulic Cements by X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis, Advances in Civil Engineering Materials, August 2014, ASTM International,
DOI: 10.1520/acem20140014.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page