What is it about?

In the present article, I carry on the discussion concerning the origin of souls. I engage with a recent and interesting development of Hasker's emergent substance dualism theory on the origin of souls where he critiques both materialism and creationist versions of substance dualism.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

It is important for motivating the origin of souls discussion and showing its relevance in contemporary theological anthropology.

Perspectives

The article offers a few alternatives to Hasker's emergent substance dualism.

Dr. Joshua Farris
Ruhr-Universitat Bochum

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Safe house souls: Bodily Charged Souls – Responding to Hasker’s “Souls, Beastly, and Human”, Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, January 2016, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1515/nzsth-2016-0031.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page