What is it about?

In his Morning Hours, a mere four years after the publication of the first edition of the Critique of Pure Reason, Moses Mendelssohn provided an accurate and complete refutation of Kant’s criticism of the ontological argument. In this paper, I expound the way in which both Kant and Mendelssohn conceive of the ontological proof. Later, I analyse Mendelssohn’s discussion of the three possible forms in which Kant’s main objection to the argument can be presented, as identified by Mendelssohn himself. I conclude that Mendelssohn’s defence of the ontological proof, far from being an attempt to reduce the question to a mere verbal dispute, seems to succeed in drastically limiting the value and scope of Kant’s criticism of speculative theology.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Mendelssohn’s Refutation of Kant’s Critique of the Ontological Proof, Kant-Studien, January 2017, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1515/kant-2017-0097.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page