What is it about?

This article is all about how the current English law on psychiatric damage is based on out-dated ideas and how it needs to change. My argument suggests that the decision in Alcock rested heavily on understandings of the media and broadcasting technologies that have now changed. I suggest that the law needs to include claims that show harm disseminated via media.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Rethinking Alcock in the New Media Age, Journal of European Tort Law, January 2016, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1515/jetl-2016-0013.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page