What is it about?

The comparison of two films nearly one hundred years apart that both imagine astronomical collisions with Earth reveals a key problem in depicting the end of the world: from what vantage point can it be perceived, post-destruction?

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Apocalyptic fiction has begun increasingly to work through the possibilities of a post-human future. These two films measure the shift in assumptions that makes Lars von Trier's fantasy of total annihilation—and its aftermath—possible.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Apocalypse Then and Now: Verdens Undergang (1916) and Melancholia (2011), European Journal of Scandinavian Studies, January 2016, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1515/ejss-2016-0007.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page