What is it about?
This article shows, that the destruction of Arofel's shield doesn't necesseraly corresponds with the termination of its semiotic function. The latter is able to uphold its role as a marker of guilt until it 'rematerializes' itself.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Das getilgte Ding, Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB), January 2017, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1515/bgsl-2017-0027.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page