What is it about?

This article shows, that the destruction of Arofel's shield doesn't necesseraly corresponds with the termination of its semiotic function. The latter is able to uphold its role as a marker of guilt until it 'rematerializes' itself.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Das getilgte Ding, Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB), January 2017, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1515/bgsl-2017-0027.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page