What is it about?
Ventilation-perfusion scanning is considered more sensitive for the detection of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension than computed tomography pulmonary angiography; however the former is often not performed in clinical practice. We performed a retrospective review to compare the sensitivities of these two scans for detecting thromboembolic disease. We found that ventilation perfusions scanning is more sensitive and that in 1/3 of cases computed tomography pulmonary angiography was falsely negative while the ventilation-perfusion scan was accurately positive.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Discordance between Imaging Modalities in the Evaluation of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Combined Experience from Two Academic Medical Centers, Annals of the American Thoracic Society, February 2019, American Thoracic Society,
DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201809-588rl.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page