What is it about?

This article discuss how children's literature critics have made claims about children and gender and sexual identity. I argue that there are problems with the understandings of the work of literary theorist Jacqueline Rose and queer theorist Judith Butler, who are often cited by these critics.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Children's Literature studies has itself remarked on the long-standing history of referring to the theories of Jacqueline Rose in her 1984 book 'The Case of Peter Pan or the Impossibility of Children's Fiction', and has at the same time noted how little the critics actually do with the arguments Rose makes. I have written a number of books and articles exploring Rose's work and its implications for all thinking about childhood, and in this article I focus especially on the relationship of Rose's arguments to those of Judith Butler, and how and why they both seem to be misunderstood in childhood and children's literature studies, in my view.

Perspectives

Please note that this article is closely related to another article I have recently published about childhood and sexual identity especially in relation to transgender, which was published in the online journal BREAC and is therefore freely available on the internet: http://breac.nd.edu/articles/69168-childrens-literature-sexual-identity-gender-and-childhood/

Professor Karin Lesnik-Oberstein
University of Reading

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Gender, Childhood and Children’s Literature, Asian Women, June 2016, Research Institute of Asian Women,
DOI: 10.14431/aw.2016.06.32.2.1.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page