What is it about?
This review examines Jay Haley’s Strategies of Psychotherapy (1963), a groundbreaking work that reframed how therapists understand and treat psychological distress. Haley argued that problems do not exist solely within individuals; they emerge from patterns of interaction and influence between people. Therapists are positioned as active agents of change, using strategic and sometimes paradoxical techniques to alter these relational patterns. The review outlines Haley’s intellectual influences, including Gregory Bateson’s communication theory, Milton Erickson’s hypnotic methods, and Don Jackson’s family therapy research. Each chapter is analyzed to show practical applications: treating symptoms as communicative tactics, using directive interventions, applying paradox to bypass resistance, and addressing challenges in couples, families, and schizophrenia treatment. This work matters because it gives clinicians actionable strategies grounded in relational dynamics. By attending to communication, power, and systemic patterns, therapists can create meaningful change that extends beyond individual symptoms and improves relational functioning across families and social networks.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Haley’s ideas remain relevant in contemporary therapy, influencing family systems, strategic interventions, and relational approaches in mental health. This review connects historical theory to modern practice, emphasizing methods that allow therapists to move from passive insight to active, systemic intervention. It provides tools for understanding power, communication, and behavior in relational contexts, offering a clear path from theory to measurable clinical results.
Perspectives
When I set out to review Strategies of Psychotherapy, I did not want to produce merely another historical summary. My work has long centered on Haley’s strategic and systemic approach as a living clinical and epistemological resource; not a relic of mid‑20th century family therapy. Drawing on my own scholarship that situates Haley within broader conversations about communication theory, relational power, and adaptive clinical practice, I read Haley through both his own lineage and contemporary needs for action‑oriented intervention. Building on systemic thinkers like Bateson and Erickson, I argue that Haley’s directive techniques enact an epistemology of knowledge‑through‑disruption, not insight‑through‑reflection alone, and that this remains deeply relevant for clinicians navigating complexity in real-world practice (e.g., mentorship and supervision contexts where strategic thinking shapes ethical and culturally responsive work). This review reflects my conviction that strategy in psychotherapy must be understood as a dynamic, relational, and context‑sensitive art of intervention rather than a set of static rules. My aim is neither to canonize Haley uncritically nor to isolate his work in a niche; instead, I position strategic therapy as a vital engine of clinical articulation that continues to inform effective systemic practice across diverse settings, from family conflict to supervision and beyond.
Assoc. Prof. Ezra N. S. Lockhart
National University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Review of "Strategies of psychotherapy.", May 2025, ScienceOpen,
DOI: 10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-uncat.bknho5.v1.rpiiel.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
