What is it about?
The field of artistic research in illustration requires an updated definition of illustration to accompany recent exploratory research methods, concepts and media. A consideration of the etymology of ‘illustration’ and ‘illumination’ leads to the pre-Latin root, leuk (‘light’), and the problematic conflation of illustrating with enlightenment. Referring to Derrida’s Socratic theory of illustration and critique of mimicry, I argue for expanding illustration definitions to include ‘shadows’ – illustration’s propensity to mislead or falsify. I adopt the ancient word ghel (‘glow’) to recuperate the illusory aspect of illustrating as a more embodied, alternative conceptualization of shining light and casting shadow, one that puts visual and affectual meanings before verbal. Then I provide examples of how in practice ghel, iconoclasm and aniconism illustrate ‘non-representable’ events and experiences. I conclude with a definition of illustration for illustration research.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This article contributes a new idea to the ever-slippery definition of illustration.
Perspectives
The field of Illustration Research is new and rapidly evolving, and the Journal of Illustration is central to its development. The definition of illustration needs reconsideration as the practice of illustration is shifting.
Jaleen Grove
Rhode Island School of Design
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: What is illustration? A shadowy definition for illustration research, Journal of Illustration, April 2024, Intellect,
DOI: 10.1386/jill_00083_1.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







