What is it about?
How has the notion of skill evolved across art history? The (indexical) line helps answer this question through a quick overview of its instances in relation with beauty and masterfulness. However, has the twentieth century dropped the notion of skill altogether when it favoured conceptualism and automatism? Have machines led us to disengage with skill? Or has it been revisited and had it ableism and other biases corrected by the indexical line?
Featured Image
Photo by Mario Gogh on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This paper introduces the notion of the indexical line, a line seen as a trace. The term is borrowed to the father of semiotics, Charles Sanders Pierce, who came up with such a generous notion of language that it can encompass any sign produced by humans or non-humans as long as it means something to someone. In art theory, the index is an important concept that was developed by Rosalind Krauss and more recently by Margaret Iversen, as a direct contact with the world through mark-making. Using this notion to understand skill in contemporary art means to displace image-making as representation and considering it a form of contact and as an inclusive, anti-ableist inter-relationship with the viewer.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Unskilled beauty or ugly truth? A dialogic study of the indexical line, Drawing Research Theory Practice, April 2021, Intellect,
DOI: 10.1386/drtp_00048_1.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page