What is it about?
In this paper, I discuss print and screen adaptations of the Spartacus story to make a case for reading the Hunger Games trilogy as a radical fiction not of political revolution per se but of the intimate feeling on which revolution depends. In her trilogy, Suzanne Collins suggests that the fierce self-interest of the modern political economy—exemplified in the arena—has eroded vital bonds of care and affection traditionally fostered at home. In response, she attempts to recuperate the family as a meaningful social form by telling a kind of Spartacus story that recasts the gladiator revolutionary as a self-sacrificing teenager fighting out of sisterly love. Unlike rival stories told in Ridley Scott’s Gladiator and cable-channel Starz’s Spartacus, Collins’s trilogy reveals a gladiator paradigm driven by a desire to care for, rather than punish, bodies politic.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The Hunger Games, Spartacus, and Other Family Stories: Sentimental Revolution in Contemporary Young-Adult Fiction, The Lion and the Unicorn, January 2015, Project Muse,
DOI: 10.1353/uni.2015.0027.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page







