What is it about?

Referendums have been portrayed as a favorite tool of populists and autocratic leaders. The empirical evidence, however, does not support this reading. The total number of plebiscites in dictatorships has fallen. Well-functioning constitutional constraints, rather than populist agitation, have been the driving forces behind many referendums in democracies. Further, where populist leaders have pushed for referendums, the resulting votes have not generally gone in their favor. The referendum has generally been a mechanism for strengthening democracy, a people’s shield even when governments have attempted to wield it as a sword.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

With an increasing number of referendums being held, this article shows what their implications are. Unlike the view of its critics, referendums do not lead to demagoguery or populism. Rather they limit the scope of would-be despots and provides a safety-valve that limits the power of the elites.

Perspectives

Referendums can be abused. All political institutions can. But - as this comprehensive survey shows - more often than not, referendums provide a a people's shield against the overeager elites and is a potent weapon against politicians who think they have all the right answers.

Professor Matt H. QVORTRUP
Coventry University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Demystifying Direct Democracy, Journal of Democracy, January 2017, Project Muse,
DOI: 10.1353/jod.2017.0052.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page