What is it about?

The article compares Jewish-American literary studies, as described by Benjamin Schreier, with African-American studies, as described by Kenneth Warren, in order to reach a conclusion about ethnic studies in general. It argues that ethnic studies does not exist merely because a constituency demands it; it exists because the experience of the constituency it represents needs to be preserved, transmitted, and interpreted for the good of democracy.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Ethnic studies has been criticized, sometimes out loud and sometimes by quiet implication, for not being a genuine discipline or meeting rigorous intellectual standards. This article argues with two very eloquent critics of their respective ethnic studies fields in order to make a strong case for the value of ethnic studies in terms other than piety or demography.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: What Is Ethnic Studies For?, symplokē, January 2021, Project Muse,
DOI: 10.1353/sym.2021.0045.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page