What is it about?

This article examines how governments respond to international criticism when they are weakening democratic institutions at home. It shows that countries experiencing democratic backsliding often avoid reforming political and civil rights, the areas that threaten leaders’ hold on power, and instead introduce reforms in women’s economic rights. Drawing on cross-national data and interviews with participants in UN human rights processes, the study demonstrates that improvements in women’s economic rights can occur alongside continued democratic decline. The findings highlight how governments strategically manage international pressure and how different categories of human rights can move in opposite directions.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This research is important because it shows that international human rights pressure can have unintended effects. When governments are backsliding democratically, they may respond strategically—improving less politically threatening rights, such as women’s economic rights, while continuing to restrict political freedoms. This challenges the assumption that progress in one area of human rights necessarily signals broader democratic improvement. Understanding this pattern helps scholars, advocates, and policymakers design more effective monitoring and accountability strategies.

Perspectives

I’m grateful for the insightful feedback I received when presenting this work at a workshop on human rights and democratic backsliding at Arizona State University’s California Center, which helped sharpen the theoretical framing of the project.

Professor Sara Beth Kahn-Nisser
Open University of Israel

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Deflecting criticism: backsliding states and women’s economic rights reform, European Journal of Politics and Gender, March 2026, Policy Press,
DOI: 10.1332/25151088y2026d000000134.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page