What is it about?

This essay explores the treatment of physical pain in literary realism during a cultural moment defined by both an aversion to pain and the pursuit of civilized comfort. The essay surveys religious and medical approaches to pain before examining how Edith Wharton, Henry James, and William Dean Howells each represent exposure to pain as essential to civilized refinement.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Scholars have written extensively about the importance of pain to such literary modes as sentimentalism and naturalism, but to this date little has been said about its importance to realism. This essay maintains that the realists rejected a sentimental immersion in the suffering of others without going so far as to embrace the prevailing cultural revulsion from pain. It argues that the restraint with which the realists approached the subject of pain mirrors the sensitivity in the face of pain that they also endorsed thematically.

Perspectives

This essay derives from my current book project of the same title. During the final decades of the nineteenth century, many privileged Americans pursued a painless ideal that entailed denying both the necessity of physical pain and any personal value in exposure to it. By the century’s turn, physical suffering had increasingly come to seem not just avoidable but loathsome, especially for members of the upper classes who could both afford and also supposedly needed insulation more because they were perceived as more alive to suffering than were their cruder peers. In short, to be civilized increasingly meant to possess the capacity to respond exquisitely to pain but the inclination and the option not to experience it. The U.S. literary realists examined in my study, however, resisted this contemporary aversion to pain. Invested for a number of reasons in depicting physical suffering, they embraced the concept of a heightened sensitivity to pain as an inevitable effect of the civilizing process and suggested to those inclined to shrink from physical suffering that continued exposure to it could potentially enhance refinement. Authors discussed in this study include Alice, Henry, and William James, William Dean Howells, Mark Twain, Edith Wharton, W. E. B. Du Bois, Gertrude Stein, and Ernest Hemingway.

Professor Cynthia J Davis
University of South Carolina

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: “The Ache of the Actual”: Pain and the Aesthetics of US Literary Realism, American Literature, September 2015, Duke University Press,
DOI: 10.1215/00029831-3149369.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page