What is it about?
Invited commentary on Christian Robert et al's extensive analysis of Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Stresses the influence of Cambridge philosopher Broad's criticism of Laplacian Bayesian analysis on Jeffreys's thinking.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Comment, Statistical Science, May 2009, Institute of Mathematical Statistics,
DOI: 10.1214/09-sts284b.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
