What is it about?

Guided by the evidence that delaying coronary revascularization may lead to symptom worsening and poorer clinical outcomes, expansion in cardiac surgery capacity has been recommended in Canada. Provincial governments started providing one-time and recurring increases in budgets for additional open heart surgeries to reduce waiting times. We sought to determine whether the year of decision to proceed with non-emergency coronary bypass surgery had an effect on time to surgery.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

In health care systems with universal access to care, efforts to contain costs result in wait lists for surgical procedures. Waiting times for non-emergency coronary bypass surgery shortened after supplementary funding was granted to increase volume of cardiac surgical care in a health system with publicly-funded universal coverage for the procedure. The effect of the supplementary funding was not uniform for patients that access the services through wait lists and through direct admission. Keywords: Access to care, CABG, Surgical wait lists, Health policy

Perspectives

What is more important, budget deficit or access to care?

Professor Boris Sobolev
University of British Columbia

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Evaluation of supply-side initiatives to improve access to coronary bypass surgery, BMC Health Services Research, September 2012, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-311.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page