Publication not explained
This publication has not yet been explained in plain language by the author(s). However, you can still read the publication.
If you are one of the authors, claim this publication so you can create a plain language summary to help more people find, understand and use it.
Featured Image
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Invited commentary on ‘different minimal clinically important difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index when using the same sample of patients’, Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, May 2013, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1179/1066981713z.00000000057.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
