Can we trust that CBT-based batterer intervention programmes are effective?—Use of evidence for the treatment of IPV offenders in the prison and probation service

What is it about?

The paper examines the use of evidence by the Swedish Prison and Probation Service (SPPS) in accrediting and declaring effective their CBT‐based BIPs. Findings: Despite SPPS claims that their CBT‐based BIPs are successful, there are no independent scientific evidence that the methods they use are effective in reducing recidivism of intimate partner violence. The interpretative analysis suggests that the term “evidence” is used somewhat rhetorically by the service, to frame the programmes as scientifically validated, cost‑efficient and successful — whereas the actual state of knowledge remains uncertain. He argues a more realistic, transparent approach is needed: the public has the right to know that treatment of IPV offenders often rests on uncertain evidence.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

There is evidence of some effectiveness, but the evidence base is not valid, the effects are modest, and the context and implementation are important.