What is it about?

This article enquires into the efficacy of money in raising income and stabilizing price level, and it also attempts to identify the effective component of money in this direction over the period 1971–2012. The autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach to co-integration confirms the existence of a long-run relationship among money, income and price level. Error correction mechanism (ECM–ARDL) models with a battery of econometric techniques such as vector autoregression (VAR) model, the Wald test and innovation accounting confirm that only M1 money supply causes a raise in income. Price level, on the other hand, negatively contributes to income. Three components of money supply namely M1, M2 and M3 lead to a raise in price or inflation where M2 money is found to be the most potent component provoking inflation. The role of income is insignificant. Competent management of monetary instruments, therefore, may promote higher income maintaining stability in price level.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

A rigorous empirical study confirms the efficacy of the components of money to raise income and stabilizing price level which has implication in monetary management.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Monetary Policy, Income Growth and Price Stability in Malaysia, South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance, May 2015, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/2277978715574620.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page