What is it about?

This article argues that disasters should no longer be seen as rare, isolated events that can simply be controlled or managed. In the Anthropocene, where human activity is reshaping the planet, disasters are becoming more frequent, interconnected and unpredictable. The paper shows why traditional disaster management is no longer enough and suggests a different approach: building urban resilience through transformation. Rather than only trying to return cities to their previous condition after a crisis, the article calls for changes that make cities more ecologically sustainable, socially inclusive, economically fair and institutionally responsive. In this way, disasters can also become moments that push societies to rethink and improve how they live.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

As disasters become more frequent, interconnected and harder to predict, older disaster management approaches are becoming less convincing. This article rethinks disasters through the lens of the Anthropocene and argues that cities need more than recovery or adaptation. What is needed is a transformative form of urban resilience that addresses the ecological, social, economic and institutional conditions that produce vulnerability in the first place.

Perspectives

I hope this article encourages readers to think more critically about disasters and urban resilience.

İbrahim Hatipoğlu
Bursa Uludag University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Reinterpreting disasters and urban resilience in the Anthropocene: Disaster management or transforming with disasters?, The Anthropocene Review, April 2026, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/20530196261432633.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page